Judgment affirmed.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred when it ruled that the prosecutor could question him as to three prior convictions (see, People v Sandoval,
Defendant had been arrested on approximately 27 occasions between 1973 and 1982. The court granted defendant's Sandoval motion to the extent of excluding questioning with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.