Order affirmed, with costs.
In the instant complaint, plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that (1) he retained the defendants to represent him in a Federal antitrust action against the National Hockey League, (2) in 1980 a judgment was rendered against him, on the merits, in the Federal antitrust action and (3) but for the legal malpractice of the defendants, he would have prevailed in the Federal antitrust action.
Prior to the joinder of issue, defendants...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
