1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 176 Cal.App.3d
  5. 176 Cal.App.3d 693 (1985)
 

COUNTY OF BUTTE v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 25451.

176 Cal.App.3d 693 (1985)

222 Cal. Rptr. 429

COUNTY OF BUTTE et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF BUTTE COUNTY, Respondent; HAL T. BROOKS, Individually and as Sheriff, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

December 20, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Leonard & Lyde and Daniel V. Blackstock for Petitioners.

Mark A. Wasser as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Robert L. Hewitt for Real Parties in Interest.

Kreinces, Hemley & O'Brien, John P. O'Brien, Mastagni, Holstedt & Chiurazzi and Kenneth R. Hulse as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

CARR, Acting P.J.

This proceeding in mandamus arises out of a dispute between the Butte County Board of Supervisors (Board) and the Butte County Sheriff, Hal T. Brooks, over the funding of the sheriff's department for the 1985-1986 fiscal year. The budget for that year was adopted by the Board on August 7, 1985. The new spending plan reduced the overall staffing of the sheriff's department by 12 positions. However, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases