1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 773 F.2d
  5. 773 F.2d 92 (1985)
 

CINCINNATI FLUID POWER, INC. v. REXNORD, INC.

No. 84-3326.

773 F.2d 92 (1985)

CINCINNATI FLUID POWER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REXNORD, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided September 19, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence D. Walker, argued, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant-appellant.

James M. Moore, argued, Cincinnati, Ohio, plaintiff-appellee.

Before JONES and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Rexnord, Inc. (Racine) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff Cincinnati Fluid Power, Inc. (Fluid Power) in this diversity suit. Fluid Power relied upon Ohio's promissory estoppel doctrine in seeking damages for denial of an allegedly promised distributorship. Defendant Racine assigns error in the trial court's failure to give requested jury instructions, challenges evidentiary rulings, and alleges an absence of evidence supporting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases