1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 712 P.2d
  5. 712 P.2d 149 (1985)
 

HOEKSTRE v. GOLDEN B. PRODUCTS

98,450; 127,420; CA A31718.

712 P.2d 149 (1985)

77 Or.App. 104

Frank D. HOEKSTRE and Shirley E. Hoekstre, Respondents, v. GOLDEN B. PRODUCTS, Inc., and Bert W. Harrison, Respondents. Bert W. Harrison, Respondent, v. Peter S. Rudie, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 26, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied February 14, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Alexander A. Wold, Jr., Eugene, Oregon, argued the cause for respondent Harrison. With him on the brief was Dwyer, Simpson & Wold, P.C., Eugene.

No appearance for respondents Hoekstre and Golden B. Products, Inc.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

WARREN, Judge.

Defendant Rudie (defendant) appeals from a judgment in a legal malpractice case. The malpractice was alleged to have occurred during his representation of Golden B. Products, Inc. (Golden B.) and Harrison, president of Golden B., in a shareholder's derivative suit, which will be referred to as "the Hoekstre case." Harrison, plaintiff in the instant action, charged defendant with negligence in his representation at trial and on appeal of the Hoekstre...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases