GEE v. GEE


113 A.D.2d 736 (1985)

Gary Gee, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Minnie Crisp, et al., Appellants, v. Richard Gee, Defendant, and Arnold Buick, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

September 3, 1985


Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In the within action, which arises out of an automobile accident resulting in personal injuries to plaintiffs, the claim against defendant Arnold Buick rests upon its ownership of one of the vehicles involved in the accident and its consent and permission, express or implied, to the operation of such vehicle (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 [1]). A strong presumption of the owner's consent arises from the use or operation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases