TREBESCH v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

CA A28498; SC S30900; EAB 83-AB-586A.

710 P.2d 136 (1985)

300 Or. 264

Roland I. TREBESCH, Respondent On Review, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Raymond P. Thorne, Assistant Director, Dhr, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 26, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied January 28, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Schradle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Judith Tegger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Michael Marcus, Legal Aid Service, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief was Terri K. Borchers, Legal Aid Service, Portland.


ROBERTS, Judge.

The issue is whether the Assistant Director of the Employment Division was required to promulgate a rule defining the statutory phrase "systematic and sustained effort to obtain work" before it could deny claimant extended unemployment benefits for failing to fulfill the statutory requirement.

An individual is, by statute, ineligible for extended unemployment benefits if the individual failed "actively [to] engage in seeking work." ORS 657...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases