1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 50 B.R.
  5. 50 B.R. 34 (1985)
 

MATTER OF SALEM MORTG. CO.

Bankruptcy Nos. 83-01607-G and 83-01610-G to 83-01612-G, Adv. Nos. 84-1067, 84-1068-G.

50 B.R. 34 (1985)

In the Matter of SALEM MORTGAGE COMPANY, Fidelity Fund, Inc., Fidelity Securities Corp., Nationwide Mortgage Co., Debtors. In the Matter of SALEM MORTGAGE COMPANY, Debtor. Kathie BAKER, individually and as representative of a class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. John J. HIGHLAND, Elaine M. Highland, and Cheryl E. Highland, Jointly and Severally, both individually and as representatives of a class of persons similarly situated, Defendants. John J. HIGHLAND, Elaine M. Highland, and Cheryl E. Highland, Jointly and Severally, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. SALEM MORTGAGE COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, Third-Party Defendants. In the Matter of SALEM MORTGAGE COMPANY, Debtor. Irene PUSTELAK and Virginia Pustelak, individually and as representatives of a class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Peter VANDENBERGHE and Ethel Vandenberghe, Jointly and Severally, both individually and as representatives of a class of persons similarly situated, Defendants. Peter VANDENBERGHE and Ethel Vandenberghe, Jointly and Severally, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. SALEM MORTGAGE COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, Third-Party Defendant.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

January 16, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clark D. Cunningham, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Martin W. Bordoley, Southfield, Mich., for defendants.

Kemp, Klein, Endelman & Beer, P.C., Birmingham, Mich., for trustee Francis C. Flood.

Thomas J. Barrow, Detroit, Mich., Trustee for Salem Mortg.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF NON-CORE PROCEEDINGS, TO REMAND, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RAY REYNOLDS GRAVES, Bankruptcy Judge.

These proceedings come before the Court on separate motions by the Plaintiff to remand, and to determine these proceedings to be non-core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3); and on Defendant's motion for summary judgment. For reasons set forth below the Court finds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases