1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 109 A.D.2d
  5. 109 A.D.2d 728 (1985)
 

FURGANG v. LENEFSKY, MEIER & NOVOD

109 A.D.2d 728 (1985)

Philip Furgang, Respondent-Appellant, v. Lenefsky, Meier & Novod, Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 4, 1985

Judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.

We find that plaintiff was requested to perform certain services for clients of the defendant law firm, at the request of defendant, because of plaintiff's expertise in a specialized area of the law, and that he rendered the services. An obligation to pay for these services is therefore imposed by operation of law, even in the absence of an agreement or expression of assent by word or act as to the amount of the fee (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases