ELECTRO-CRAFT CORP. v. CONTROLLED MOTION, INC.

No. C0-85-275.

370 N.W.2d 465 (1985)

ELECTRO-CRAFT CORPORATION, Respondent, v. CONTROLLED MOTION, INC., et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 19, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold D. Field, Jr., Michael A. Nekich, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Richard D. Donohoo, Garrett E. Mulrooney, St. Paul, for appellants.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and FOLEY, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Respondent-plaintiff Electro-Craft Corporation (ECC) sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a temporary injunction (TI) against appellant-defendant Controlled Motion, Inc. (CMI). ECC posted $260,000 in bonds. The district court permanently enjoined CMI, but the supreme court reversed this order, holding that ECC failed to establish trade secrets.

CMI moved the district court to assess its damages against the injunction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases