STATE v. CARABALLO

No. 84-1265.

17 Ohio St. 3d 66 (1985)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. CARABALLO, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 8, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory W. Happ, prosecuting attorney, Dean Holman, Judith A. Cross and Reginald S. Kramer, for appellee.

Jerome Emoff and Thomas M. Shaughnessey, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

The sole issue presented upon appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea to the felony charge of drug trafficking. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the court's ruling.

After a defendant has been sentenced, a court may permit withdrawal of a plea only to correct a manifest injustice. Crim. R. 32.1. The burden of establishing the existence of such injustice is upon the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases