LUKE v. BALDWIN-UNITED CORP.

Docket No. G000514.

167 Cal.App.3d 664 (1985)

213 Cal. Rptr. 654

WILLIAM F. LUKE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BALDWIN-UNITED CORPORATION, Defendant; BUCHALTER, NEMER, FIELDS, CHRYSTIE & YOUNGER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

April 30, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Buchalter, Nemer, Fields, Chrystie & Younger, Leonard D. Venger, Phyllis J. Bersch and Jovina R. Hargis for Defendant and for Appellant.

O'Donnell & Gordon, Jeffrey S. Gordon, Steven F. Pflaum and Jan Norman for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

WALLIN, J.

Buchalter, Nemer, Fields, Chrystie and Younger (Attorneys) appeal an order of the superior court imposing $4,501.25 in sanctions jointly against the law firm and its client, Baldwin-United Corporation (Baldwin) for filing a frivolous motion to quash. Baldwin has not appealed the order. The issue presented is whether Attorneys' conduct was so egregious as to justify the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Code of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases