SHANNON v. PAY 'N SAVE CORP.

No. 51117-9.

104 Wn.2d 722 (1985)

709 P.2d 799

IRIS SHANNON, Respondent, v. PAY 'N SAVE CORPORATION, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

November 21, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ryan, Swanson, Hendel & Cleveland, by Michael R. Rayton and Thao Tiedt, for appellant.

Salter, McKeehen & Rabine, by James R.B. Salter and Carleton H.A. Taber, for respondent.


DURHAM, J.

Pay 'n Save Corporation appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding it liable, pursuant to RCW 49.60, for discriminating against Iris Shannon in employment because of her gender. Pay 'n Save contends that the trial court erred by: (1) submitting Shannon's theory of disparate impact to the jury, (2) allowing Shannon to introduce statistical evidence at trial, (3) refusing to find that a juror's statements constituted misconduct requiring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases