1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 200 N.J.
  5. 200 N.J. Super. 620 (1985)
 

SKRIPEK v. BERGAMO

200 N.J. Super. 620 (1985)

491 A.2d 1336

JEAN E. SKRIPEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ANGELO R. BERGAMO, M.D., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 2, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jean E. Skripek, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Paul G. Nittoly argued the cause for respondent (Shanley & Fisher, attorneys, Mr. Nittoly, of counsel; Jeffrey S. Brown, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, PETRELLA and BAIME.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Jean E. Skripek appeals from a judgment of the Law Division entered on a molded jury verdict of no cause for action in favor of defendant Angelo R. Bergamo, M.D., and from a denial of her motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff instituted this medical malpractice action against defendant seeking to recover damages sustained as the result of a post-operative closed capsulotomy performed by him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases