1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 364 N.W.2d
  5. 364 N.W.2d 450 (1985)
 

NEW CONCEPT CONFINEMENT TECH. v. KUECKER

No. CX-84-1634.

364 N.W.2d 450 (1985)

NEW CONCEPT CONFINEMENT TECHNOLOGY FEEDERS, INC., Appellant, v. Dr. R.D. KUECKER, Respondent, Dr. R.J. Diemer, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied May 31, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Skjervold, Skjervold Law Office, Shorewood, for appellant.

John M. Sheran, Farrish, Johnson, Maschka & Hottinger, Mankato, for respondents.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and FOLEY, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant New Concept Confinement Technology Feeders, Inc., sued respondents, a group of veterinarians doing business as Cottonwood Veterinarian Clinic. The complaint alleged respondents tortiously interfered with contractual relations between appellant and its customers by filing an invalid veterinarian's lien and by sending letters notifying customers of the lien. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases