HILT v. BERNSTEIN

Nos. A8304 02699; CA A29842.

707 P.2d 88 (1985)

75 Or.App. 502

Kay HILT, Appellant, v. James E. BERNSTEIN and Mark E. Pengilly, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 2, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied November 8, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Sacks, Portland, for appellant. With him on briefs were Jolles, Sokol & Bernstein, P.C., Portland.

Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, submitted brief for respondent James E. Bernstein.

G. Kenneth Shiroishi, Portland, for respondent Mark E. Pengilly. With him on brief were Mary Chaffin, Joan O'Neill and Black, Tremaine, Higgins, Lankton & Krieger, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


WARDEN, Judge.

This is a malpractice action against two attorneys. Plaintiff's amended complaint contained allegations of negligence and breach of fiduciary duty against Bernstein and allegations of negligence against Pengilly. The trial court dismissed the complaint on the attorneys' respective motions to dismiss for failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to state a claim, ORCP 21A(8), and plaintiff declined to plead further. She appeals from the subsequent judgments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases