CRANSTON v. CITY OF RICHMOND

Docket No. S.F. 24834.

40 Cal.3d 755 (1985)

710 P.2d 845

221 Cal. Rptr. 779

ERIC CRANSTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF RICHMOND et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of California.

December 30, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William H. Sortor and Carroll, Burdick & McDonough for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Malcolm Hunter, City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

GRODIN, J.

Appellant Eric Cranston was discharged from his job as a Richmond City Police Officer. The city personnel board sustained the discharge, and the superior court denied a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. The principal question presented by Cranston's appeal is whether a police officer may be disciplined for "conduct unbecoming an employee of the City Service" when, though previously warned about his driving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases