1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 695 P.2d
  5. 695 P.2d 88 (1985)
 

ZAIK/MILLER v. HEDRICK

A8306-04153; CA A29773.

695 P.2d 88 (1985)

72 Or.App. 20

ZAIK/MILLER, Architects, Respondents, v. Howard HEDRICK and Doris Hedrick, Husband and Wife, Appellants. Zaik/Miller, Architects, Appellants, v. Howard Hedrick and Doris Hedrick, Husband and Wife, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 6, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger L. Meyer, Portland, argued the cause for respondents, appellants Zaik/Miller, Architects. With him on the briefs were Joshua Kadish and Newcomb, Sabin, Meyer & Schwartz, Portland.

Howard R. Hedrick, Portland, argued the cause for appellants, respondents Howard Hedrick and Doris Hedrick. With him on the briefs was Hedrick & David, P.C., Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendants appeal from the trial court's denial of their exceptions to an arbitrator's award and from the court's entry of judgment on the award. Most of defendants' arguments are wholly without merit, and those that are colorable are adversely answered by Brewer v. Allstate Insurance Co., 248 Or. 558, 436 P.2d 547 (1968), and Eugene Educ. Assoc. v. Eugene School Dist. 4J,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases