1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 39 Wn.
  5. 39 Wn. App. 740 (1985)
 

SMITH v. STURM, RUGER & CO.

No. 5517-5-III.

39 Wn. App. 740 (1985)

695 P.2d 600

WAYNE C. SMITH, Appellant, v. STURM, RUGER & CO., INC., Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

February 5, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward A. Dawson, Marcia Meade, and Dawson & Meade, for appellant.

Frank H. Johnson, Steven Stocker, and MacGillivray & Jones, for respondent.

MUNSON, J.

Wayne C. Smith appeals a judgment on a jury verdict adverse to his products liability claim and the trial court's dismissal of his Consumer Protection Act (CPA) claim. He contends: (1) the special verdict form was improper; (2) his CPA claim should have gone to the jury; and (3) testimony by his expert regarding a survey taken by a consultant for Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. (Sturm) was admissible. We affirm.

On December 2, 1979,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases