PER CURIAM.
The appellee brought a suit for the return of monies illegally extracted by the appellant bank in the form of usury. The cause was tried by a jury, which rendered upon special interrogatory a verdict, finding no usury yet it awarded one-half the amount sought as damages. We find this error and reverse the award of damages. There is no evidence to support the award after the adverse finding by the jury on the usury issue. Cloutier v. Central Contracting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
