1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 175 Cal.App.3d
  5. 175 Cal.App.3d 601 (1985)
 

MAAS v. MUNICIPAL COURT

Docket No. A031014.

175 Cal.App.3d 601 (1985)

221 Cal. Rptr. 245

WILLIAM K. MAAS, JR., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent; ANTHONY JOHN SULLY, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

December 13, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Douglas J. Gray, Geoffrey T. Carr and Rockhill & Schaiman for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

William K. Maas, Jr., in pro. per., Garry, Dreyfus & McTernan, and Charles R. Garry for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SCOTT, J.

This is an appeal by real party in interest Anthony Sully from a judgment of the superior court granting a petition for writ of mandate directing the municipal court (acting as magistrate in a preliminary hearing) to grant respondents' motion to quash subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum. Appellant contends: (1) the court had no jurisdiction to consider the petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases