PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals his convictions for possession of controlled substances and possession of paraphernalia.
We find no merit in the appellant's first point on appeal. As to the second point, we agree with the state that the appellant has not preserved the issue for appellate review. Nessmith v. State,
Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.