1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 169 Cal.App.3d
  5. 169 Cal.App.3d 592 (1985)
 

PEOPLE v. PRANTIL

Docket No. 15698.

169 Cal.App.3d 592 (1985)

215 Cal. Rptr. 372

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FRANK G. PRANTIL, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

June 24, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Douglas Holbrook and Eugene G. Iredale for Defendant and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Jesus Rodriguez, Keith I. Motley and M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

WIENER, Acting P.J.

Frank G. Prantil appeals from the judgment after a jury convicted him of forgery by uttering or making use of a forged check under Penal Code section 470.1 (1) Uttering requires a person pass or offer to pass a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery and with the specific intent to defraud. (People v. Hellman (1961...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases