STATE v. FREEMAN

Nos. 84-1865 and 84-1868.

20 Ohio St. 3d 55 (1985)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. FREEMAN, APPELLANT. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. ROTH, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 27, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradford M. Gearinger, special prosecuting attorney, and James A. Rudgers, for appellee.

Blakemore, Rosen, Meeker & Varian Co., L.P.A., and Lawrence W. Vuillemin, for appellant Freeman.

Blakemore, Rosen, Meeker & Varian Co., L.P.A., Donald S. Varian, Jr., and Robert C. Meeker, for appellant Roth.


Per Curiam.

The first question raised by these appeals is whether the trial court erred in overruling appellants' pretrial motions to dismiss the indictments because of alleged irregularities in the grand jury proceedings. Specifically, appellants allege that Judges Joseph R. Kainrad and George E. Martin improperly appeared as witnesses before the grand jury, having both participated in the jury selection process. Appellants argued that this irregularity rendered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases