1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 498 A.2d
  5. 498 A.2d 250 (1985)
 

MATTER OF THOMPSON

Nos. 84-1550, 85-372.

498 A.2d 250 (1985)

In the Matter of William Edward THOMPSON, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

September 27, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Edward Thompson, Washington, D.C., pro se.

Thomas H. Henderson, Jr., Bar Counsel, and Michael S. Frisch, Assistant Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for Bar Counsel.

Before NEBEKER, NEWMAN and ROGERS, Associate Judges.

NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

This case has been here before. In re Thompson, 492 A.2d 866 (D.C.1985). As indicated in that opinion, the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) found that Thompson had violated various disciplinary rules; the Board recommended two suspensions of 90 days to be served concurrently. The Board also recommended that Thompson be compelled to complete a course in professional responsibility at an ABA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases