Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The respondent's determination was neither arbitrary nor capricious, nor contrary to law. It was in accordance with the applicable regulations and statutes. Petitioners are not seeking an adjustment which was "necessary to avoid substantial inequities arising from the use of previously certified rates" (10 NYCRR 86-2.12 [b]). The previously certified rates of some of
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
