SPAYD v. TURNER, GRANZOW & HOLLENKAMP

Nos. 84-1028 and 84-1041.

19 Ohio St. 3d 55 (1985)

SPAYD, APPELLANT AND APPELLEE, v. TURNER, GRANZOW & HOLLENKAMP ET AL., APPELLEES AND APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 9, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, John O. Henry and Steven R. Smith, for Robert Spayd.

Smith & Schnacke Co., L.P.A., Armistead W. Gilliam, Jr. and Paul G. Hallinan, for Turner, Granzow & Hollenkamp et al.


HOLMES, J.

In his appeal to this court, plaintiff Spayd contends both lower courts erred in their determination that, due to ethical considerations, there could be no accounting for goodwill upon the dissolution of a law partnership. Plaintiff further argues that the facts presented herein clearly establish a measurable element of goodwill within the operation of this particular law firm.

At the outset, it is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases