SHACKLEFORD v. MILLS


110 A.D.2d 630 (1985)

Horace Shackleford et al., Appellants, v. George Mills et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Horace Shackleford et al., Appellants, v. Charles Brooks, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) Horace Shackleford et al., Appellants, v. Timothy B. Debiak et al., Respondents. (Action No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 1, 1985


Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term properly exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs' motion for a joint trial. Involved are separate, unrelated accidents and separate trials will enable the juries to focus on the factual issues presented as to each accident (CPLR 602; Abbatepaolo v Blumberg, 7 A.D.2d 847; Pride v Perras, 6 A.D.2d 842; cf...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases