PERSGARD v. GORDON C. CARROLL & SONS, INC.

No. C9-84-1401.

362 N.W.2d 377 (1985)

George PERSGARD, Respondent, v. GORDON C. CARROLL & SONS, INC., and Gordon C. Carroll, individually, Appellants,

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied April 26, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney E. Kaner, Duluth, for respondent.

Lawrence B. Stauber, Jr., Duluth, for appellants.

Heard, considered, and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and PARKER, and HUSPENI, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Gordon Carroll appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Carroll maintains that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to take into account prior to entering judgment the respective expenses of the parties in performing a contract, and by failing to allow the jury to determine those expenses. Respondent Persgard claims that Carroll's service of the motion for new trial was not timely. We affirm.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases