Judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs. The issue argued on appeal, not having been considered by the administrative agency in making its determination, may not be reviewed by this court (Matter of Barry v O'Connell,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF KLAPAK v. BLUM
65 N.Y.2d 670 (1985)
In the Matter of Mary Klapak, Respondent, v. Barbara B. Blum, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, Appellant, et al., Respondent. (And a Second Proceeding.)
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued April 24, 1985.
Decided May 30, 1985.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.