PER CURIAM.
The issue in this legal malpractice case is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment, sustaining his plea of estoppel, and dismissing the suit with prejudice. If plaintiff's motion for judgment and answers to certain requests for admissions left extant a genuine issue of material fact, then the trial court erred.
The pertinent facts, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, are as follows: In 1979...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
