On this appeal, defendant first argues that County Court erred in not suppressing certain statements made to the police. Specifically, defendant asserts that his statements should have been suppressed because he was actually represented by an attorney in an unrelated criminal case at the time of his arrest on the instant charges. We disagree.
The evidence adduced at the suppression hearing established that, prior to waiving his rights...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.