PROPST v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

84-AB-326A; CA A32481.

696 P.2d 4 (1985)

72 Or.App. 275

Ronald D. PROPST, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Raymond P. Thorne, Administrator; and National Fruit Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 27, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cynthia Dettman, Oregon Legal Services, Albany, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, waived appearance for respondent Employment Div.

Marianna Kanwit, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Nat. Fruit Co. With her on the brief were Larry K. Amburgey, and Bullard, Korshoj, Smith & Jernstedt, P.C., Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment compensation on the ground that he was "discharged for misconduct connected with work." ORS 657.176(2)(a). We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Petitioner worked for respondent employer from 1974 until his first discharge in June, 1983, for alleged absenteeism. He filed a union grievance concerning that discharge and was reinstated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases