1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 87 Pa.Commw.
  5. 87 Pa.Commw. 605 (1985)
 

SANDUSKY v. W. C. A. B. (CHICAGO B. & I. CO.).

No. 1596 C.D. 1983.

87 Pa.Commw. 605 (1985)

Donald Sandusky, Petitioner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.), Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

February 21, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel Persky, Baskin and Sears, P.C., for petitioner.

Robert G. Rose, Spence, Custer, Saylor, Wolfe & Rose, for respondent, Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.

Submitted on briefs, November 15, 1984, to Judges ROGERS, MacPHAIL and PALLADINO, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION BY JUDGE ROGERS, February 21, 1985:

Donald Sandusky (claimant) has filed a petition for review of an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (board) affirming a referee's decision denying him benefits for his alleged total disability on the ground that he failed to meet his burden to prove that the incidence of the condition of which he complained — aggravation of his genetic lung disease...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases