MACHO v. MAHOWALD

No. C5-85-398.

374 N.W.2d 312 (1985)

Gary MACHO, Appellant, v. Bernard MAHOWALD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied November 4, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne Dordell, St. Paul, Harry F. Christian, LeCenter, for appellant.

Harry A. Cousineau, Jr., Mark A. Gwin, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and SEDGWICK, and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Macho brought an action to recover for injuries sustained when he fell off respondent's horse, which bolted immediately after he mounted it. The jury found that Macho was 40% negligent, and that respondent was 60% negligent. The trial court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict, finding that the facts were insufficient to place respondent on notice that the horse had a dangerous propensity. It further found, pertaining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases