CIANBRO CORP. v. JACKSONVILLE TRANSP. AUTH.

Nos. BF-39, BF-40.

473 So.2d 206 (1985)

CIANBRO Corporation, Williams Brothers Construction Company, Inc., and Republic Contracting Corporation, As Joint Venturers, Petitioners, v. Jacksonville Transportation Authority, Florida Department of Transportation, John Lanahan, As Chairman of the Board of the Jacksonville Transportation Authority, and Individually, Respondents. al Johnson Construction Company, a Delaware Corporation, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Jacksonville Transportation Authority, and John F. Lanahan, Individually and As Chairman of the Jacksonville Transportation Authority, Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 14, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Williams of Fuller & Johnson, Tallahassee, for Al Johnson Construction Company; and J. Marshall Conrad and Kenneth R. Hart of Ausley, McMullen, McGehee, Carruthers & Proctor, Tallahassee, for Cianbro Corporation, Williams Brothers Construction Company, Inc., and Republic Contracting Corporation, petitioners.

Robert C. Gobelman, James E. Cobb, Herbert R. Tanning and Jack W. Shaw, Jr., of Matthews, Osborne, McNatt, Gobelman & Cobb, Jacksonville, for Jacksonville Transportation Authority and John F. Lanahan, respondents.

Robert P. Smith, Jr., of Hopping, Boyd, Green & Sams, Tallahassee, representing McCarthy Brothers Company and Huarte Y Cia, S.A., a joint venture, for respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated cases come before us on Petition for Review of Non-Final Administrative Action, Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and Petition for Writ of Prohibition. This controversy arises from the bid solicitation and contract award processes conducted by respondent Jacksonville Transportation Authority (JTA) in an effort to award contracts for the construction of a bridge and bridge approaches over the St. Johns River...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases