Judgment affirmed.
Contrary to defendant's claim, the hearing court properly admitted the complaining witness' identification into evidence inasmuch as there was nothing suggestive in the photographic and lineup identifications of defendant. We also note that the sentencing court's imposition of consecutive sentences was proper inasmuch as the crimes of which defendant stands convicted were separate and distinct acts (see, People v Brathwaite,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
