Judgment affirmed.
Defendant contends that the discovery of his fingerprint upon an envelope in a drawer of the private office of the burglarized premises was insufficient to exclude to a moral certainty all reasonable hypotheses of his innocence. We disagree. There was expert testimony to the effect that such a print would last only 24 to 48 hours. Defendant's own Grand Jury testimony was admitted into evidence, wherein he asserted that he never had any dealings...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
