Judgment affirmed.
Since defense counsel did not object to the identification charge, the instant claim has not been preserved as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the trial court's charge with respect to eyewitness identification was sufficient (see, People v Whalen,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.