1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 103 Wn.2d
  5. 103 Wn.2d 570 (1985)
 

STATE v. HUBBARD

No. 50562-4.

103 Wn.2d 570 (1985)

693 P.2d 718

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. THOMAS ROY HUBBARD, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 11, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julie A. Kesler of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and William L. Downing, Deputy, for respondent.

UTTER, J.

May statements by a defendant, elicited by the State in violation of the rule set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966), be used as substantive evidence to rebut the testimony of a person other than the defendant? We hold they may not and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. State v. Hubbard,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases