Judgment affirmed.
Any prejudice to defendant from the prosecution witness's rebuttal testimony that he had been watching defendant at the time of the murder because defendant was a suspect in an unrelated burglary was vitiated by the witness's repeated statements that he subsequently learned that defendant was, in fact, not involved in that burglary.
Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.