1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 617 F.Supp.
  5. 617 F.Supp. 49 (1985)
 

B.F. HIRSCH, INC. v. ENRIGHT REFINING CO.

Civ. A. No. 81-1064.

617 F.Supp. 49 (1985)

B.F. HIRSCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. ENRIGHT REFINING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 9, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz & Kinney by Lawrence T. Neher, Roseland, N.J., Schulte Roth & Zabel by Robert M. Abrahams, Aegis J. Frumento, New York City, for plaintiff.

McCarter & English by John L. McGoldrick, John F. Brenner, Newark, N.J., for defendant.

OPINION

CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.

On November 17, 1983, this court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff, B.F. Hirsch, based on the court's findings that defendant, Enright Refining Co., Inc., had breached its contract with plaintiff when it charged a retainage fee, that Enright committed fraud by intentionally misleading plaintiff and deliberately concealing its retainage fee, and that Enright's conduct violated section 1962(c) of the Racketeer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases