MCMANUS v. STURNIOLO


129 Misc.2d 534 (1985)

Regina McManus, Plaintiff, v. Anthony Sturniolo, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

August 30, 1985


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Lemle Amsterdam for defendant. Scott K. Nigro for plaintiff.


HAROLD BAER, JR., J.

Defendant Anthony Sturniolo moves to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction since the summons fails to display the words "consumer credit transaction" as required by CPLR 305 and that the complaint fails to state a cause of action. (CPLR 3211 [a] [2], [7].) Plaintiff Regina McManus opposes the motion and cross-moves to amend the summons, nunc pro tunc, to include the words "consumer credit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases