McCONNELL v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER

Docket Nos. B009338, B010023.

176 Cal.App.3d 480 (1985)

222 Cal. Rptr. 228

JOHN A. McCONNELL et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Defendant and Appellant. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; JOHN A. McCONNELL et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

December 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rogers & Wells, Gerald E. Boltz, Charles R. Hartman, Charles E. Wheeler, MacDonald, Halsted & Laybourne, Orville A. Armstrong, and Joel Mark for Defendant and Appellant and Petitioner.

Jack D. Scott, Marcus E. Crahan, Jr., and Roger J. Aull for Plaintiffs and Respondents and Real Parties in Interest.

No appearance for Respondent Court.


OPINION

GRIGNON, J.*

Appellant and defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. (Merrill Lynch) appeals from an order made after judgment (Order) in favor of plaintiffs and respondents John A. McConnell, Marguerite McConnell and Caroline W. Barrie, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (the Class). Merrill Lynch alternatively petitions this court for a writ of mandate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases