1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 619 F.Supp.
  5. 619 F.Supp. 28 (1985)
 

WOODMANSEE v. MILLER

Civ. No. 84-0979.

619 F.Supp. 28 (1985)

Bernard J. WOODMANSEE, Sr., Petitioner, v. Harold MILLER, Warden, et al., Respondents.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

January 11, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard J. Woodmansee, pro se.

Holly Harris, Asst. U.S. Atty., Rutland, Vt., for respondents.

ORDER

NEALON, Chief Judge.

After carefully and independently reviewing the record and exceptions in this case, the court has decided to adopt the Report of Magistrate Raymond J. Durkin dated November 14, 1984 to the extent that it recommends a finding that no ex post facto violation occurred and that the Motion to Dismiss should be granted.1 Parole Guidelines in effect at the time of the offense are to be employed.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases