KOHR v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC.

Civ. A. No. 78-3942.

626 F.Supp. 20 (1985)

Eugene R. KOHR and Elaine M. Kohr, his wife, et al. v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

On Motion for Reconsideration March 9, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Pettit, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Creed C. Black, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.

Defendant, Raymark Industries, Inc., employer or former employer of plaintiffs in the instant action has moved for summary judgment on what it perceives to be the remaining claim against it, that of intentional tort.1 The motion, as originally filed, was essentially based on three arguments:

1. That there is no evidence of intentional tort;

2. That there is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases