1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 177 Cal.App.3d
  5. 177 Cal.App.3d 461 (1985)
 

IN RE LeDAY

Docket No. A027744.

177 Cal.App.3d 461 (1985)

221 Cal. Rptr. 398

In re MAURICE LeDAY on Habeas Corpus.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

December 27, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Michael Satris, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petitioner.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Thomas P. Dove, Paul D. Gifford and John C. Herbert, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

OPINION

HANING, J.

(1a) Petitioner Maurice LeDay seeks a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the extension of his recommitment to prison as a parole violator pursuant to Penal Code section 3057, subdivision (c), was an invalid ex post facto punishment.

Until January 1, 1984, subdivision (a) of section 3057 provided without additional qualification that "[c]onfinement pursuant to a revocation of parole in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases