DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.
At an earlier stage of these appellate proceedings, we considered Ramos' motion to dismiss the State's cross-appeal and held that in light of the pendency of Ramos' appeal from a judgment adjudicating him guilty of second-degree murder, the State's cross-appeal from the trial court's ruling that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury's verdict of first-degree murder was legally authorized. See Ramos v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.