1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 65 Md.
  5. 65 Md. App. 527 (1985)
 

ROWE v. CHESAPEAKE & POTOMAC TEL. CO.

No. 386, September Term, 1985.

65 Md. App. 527 (1985)

501 A.2d 464

RICHARD ROWE, ET AL. v. CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, ET AL.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

December 11, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robin Ficker, Bethesda, for appellants.

James P. Garland (Bruce E. Alexander, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, J. William Sarver and Robert J. Hallock on brief), Baltimore, for appellees.

Argued before WILNER, ADKINS and KARWACKI, JJ.

ADKINS, Judge.

Before us is the validity of § 313A of the Montgomery County Charter. That section provides:

The county government may not purchase and contract for goods and services with the C & P Telephone Company (C & P) unless C & P includes telephone subscribers in Gaithersburg, Maryland, and Montgomery Village in the Washington Metropolitan Telephone Exchange (MET) at local rates no higher than local rates charged MET subscribers in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases