Judgment affirmed.
During the course of the cross-examination of the defendant, the prosecutor (1) asked the defendant whether certain prosecution witnesses were lying and (2) suggested, through a question posed without proper foundation, that defendant was on drugs at the time of the crime. These questions were improper and have been repeatedly condemned (People v Billingsley,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.